NBER

Susan Dynarski, C.J. Libassi, Katherine Michelmore, Stephanie Owen

Bibliographic Information

NBER Working Paper No. 25349
Issued in December 2018, Revised in June 2020
NBER Program(s):CH, ED, LS, PE

A non-technical summary of this paper is available in the March 2019 NBER Digest.  You can sign up to receive the NBER Digest by email.

This paper was revised on June 2, 2020

Available Formats

Abstract

High-achieving, low-income students attend selective colleges at far lower rates than upper-income students with similar achievement. Behavioral biases, intensified by complexity and uncertainty in the admissions and aid process, may explain this gap. In a large-scale experiment we test an early commitment of free tuition at a flagship university. The intervention did not increase aid: rather, students were guaranteed before application the same grant aid that they would qualify for in expectation after admission. The offer substantially increased application (68 percent vs 26 percent) and enrollment rates (27 percent vs 12 percent). The results suggest that uncertainty, present bias, and loss aversion loom large in students’ college decisions.

National Bureau of Economic Research
1050 Massachusetts Ave.
Cambridge, MA 02138
617-868-3900
info@nber.org

Twitter RSS

View Full Site: One timeAlways